Movie Review: The Conjuring (2013)

the-conjuring-posterOh, how I wanted to like The Conjuring. It’s got a traditional haunted house setting, ripe for ghostly creepiness. It’s got James Wan. Hell, it’s got Vera Farmiga, who’s had a number of enjoyable roles in horror films. It’s even got a pretty effective atmosphere going for much of it. But it has about zero originality.

The film opens with what I found to be the creepiest part of the whole thing: a video detailing the case of a freaky-looking doll who is terrorizing a couple of nurses at their apartment. The case, we learn, is a previous one of Ed and Lorraine Warren, two real life paranormal investigators who have made cameos in various books and movies, and who become the stars of The Conjuring.

From there, we meet a family of seven as they move into a rustic house in the country big enough to shelter all five of the couple’s daughters. As you might imagine, strange things begin happening: the clocks all stop at 3:07 am, they find a boarded-up spiderweb-covered cellar, and thumping noises wake them in the middle of the night. Yadda yadda. Nothing new here. At times creepy, but extremely par for the course in any haunted house offering doled out by Hollywood.

the-conjuring music box

Also, a creepy music box with a clown in it. I feel like this belongs in the cellar from The Cabin in the Woods.

Once the haunting sufficiently terrifies the family, it’s time to call in the paranormal investigators. Enter Ed and Lorraine: interesting characters who are well portrayed, but ultimately detrimental to the mood initiated by the family’s victimization by an unnamed force. As soon as they arrive at the house and set up their equipment, some of the mystery and intrigue disappears. We feel safer, somehow, because the experts are here to save the day.

The unhappy clan is joined by a skeptical police officer who is there to oversee the proceedings. This character provides the obligatory “convert the skeptic” subplot that all demon possession movies must include. For they immediately determine that this supposed haunting is, in fact, a demon possession—not even close to a surprise, when the revelation comes.

Which leads us to the quandary: how many religion-based possession movies do we really need in our lives?

Come quick! I just realized we're stuck in a rehash of old horror tropes!

Help! I just realized we’re stuck in a rehash of old horror tropes!

The problem with so many horror movies about possession is that they limit themselves to things that are only scary to people with particular religious beliefs. In an increasingly secular world, let’s face it: we just aren’t as scared as we used to be of demons and other religious horrors. The mantra of these movies inevitably becomes the idea that we can only fight evil via the power of God, which immediately alienates anyone who doesn’t share this belief. At this point, the mystery is gone, and with it, the fear: we know what it is, and we know how to stop it. Once you introduce God into the narrative, you’re operating on a Deus ex machina where logic need not apply, and the only way to solve your problem is with crosses and holy water.

I doubt I’m the only nonreligious person who feels left out of these kinds of movies, because not only do I feel no sense of fear from them, but I also find it hard to root for the good guys, who tell everyone that they will only be saved if they believe in God. They play with the viewer like they play with the token skeptic who must necessarily be converted by the end of the film. I’m not totally against religion in horror, but look, can’t we do something different for once? Aren’t there any other religions aside from Catholicism with the potential for creepy shit? Something aside from the traditional ideas of God and Satan?

Maybe I went into this one with my hopes too high.

I understand that this movie is “based on the true story” of one of Ed and Lorraine’s investigations—but that’s no excuse for its lack of creativity. This is a mundane film: all of its tropes have been done to death time and again. I think it’s time we exorcise from Hollywood its treasured notions of exorcism, because it’s getting old. Pretty much every exorcism movie after The Exorcist has been lame and extraneous. The Conjuring is, sadly, no exception.


Plot / Originality: 3 out of 10 mysterious music boxes

Acting: 7 out of 10 mysterious music boxes

Visuals: 7 out of 10 mysterious music boxes

Music: 6 out of 10 mysterious music boxes

Script: 5 out of 10 mysterious music boxes

Scare Factor: 6 out of 10 mysterious music boxes

Overall: 5.5 out of 10 mysterious music boxes

Categories: Entertainment, Reviews


  1. Great review! I agree with most of your points, and yet, I did still enjoy the movie. You’re right, it *was* pretty “been there done that,” but it was done *well* too. I went with my GF who is atheist, and I kept thinking (once the God stuff came into it) that she’d end up hating the movie. She actually enjoyed it quite a bit, but *did* have a few choice words about religion afterwards 😉

    • My boyfriend had the same reaction as you, I think. He’s a film guy and pointed out that, from a filmmaking standpoint, this movie is quite well done. Particularly effective, to both of us, was the clapping in the dark scene. But I’m a story/creativity person, and the pretty filmmaking didn’t quite save it for me. I don’t necessarily hate something as soon as religion is involved, but I think that last screen of text cemented my eyerolling. Oh, well. There’s always Insidious 2 to look forward to!

      • Yeah, I hear ya. I forget who it was, but someone also mentioned to me that witch’s don’t worship the devil. And my GF was pretty quick to point out that all of the women that were accused of witchcraft during the Salem witch trials have long since had the convictions and excommunications reversed. 😉

  2. Terrible. Every horror cliche in the book : Terrified kids (all girls, yet), the dead family dog, several trips to the dark basement, the rising bed, the sudden noises, the creepy dead blood-smeared old lady, strobing lights, the storm, screams, a tacky religious theme, the “Poltergeist” and “Exorcist” direct rip offs, and on and on ad nauseum. This is horror by the book, but a really awful book.

  3. Is it original? No, not at all. Like many other people, I describe it as a mash-up of “Poltergeist” and “The Exorcist.” But is it well-executed? I think so.

  4. Good blog you’ve got here.. It’s hard to find high quality
    writing like yours nowadays. I really appreciate people like you!

    Take care!!

  5. I have read so many articles or reviews regarding the blogger lovers except this paragraph is truly a
    pleasant paragraph, keep it up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: